China and India Empires: Same and Different

China and India Empires: Same and Different (April 28, 2009)

 

            Since antiquity, China and India formed vast empires.  They were the wealthiest, the most populous, and the most creative in almost all fields of industries such porcelain, gun powder, paper, vaccines, compass, rudder, the zero, philosophy, art of war and you name it.  Europe relied on the silk, spices, perfume, and luxury items imported from China and India through Persia and Turkey. The Great Wall of China is the only human made construction that can be seen from space. Three centuries before Portugal put to see its galleons to circumnavigate oceans China had fleet of ships three times bigger than the biggest that Spain constructed. 

            Every society has gone through the same historical development and experienced with feudal systems, caste systems, monarchies, and oligarchies.  The difference between China and India are:

First, China had gone through the harrowing communist period but it managed to crush the priesthood or sacerdotal castes.  In India the priesthood castes are as powerful as ever.  There are millions of “untouchables” caste, the lowest caste of the five structured by the Brahma and Hinduism religions.  The “untouchables” are consecrated by religion to remain untouchables.  Beside Gandhi who confronted that humiliating condition head front no other Indian government or political parties dared to revisit this abomination.  In fact, the caste system prevalent in the Middle East was imported from India.  For over two centuries, Europe was closed to the Ottoman Empire.  The Ottoman Empire had to rely almost exclusively on India for administrative organization, culture, and trades.  Among the good things we received the worst that India could export; it is so enduring that the Middle East societies cannot shake off the plight of caste system that is exacerbated by close nit community structure.

Second, China has the mentality of becoming a superpower at par with the USA.  Everything that China is doing is at a gigantic measure such as the biggest dam with all the subsequent mass transfer of people, traditions, and customs.  The focus on urban centers and industrialization is diverting water from agriculture, the source of its initial prosperity and social stability.  A 7 months dry season in the northern part, the wheat basket region, is sending shivers of forthcoming famine.  The rivers are heavily polluted and the western diseases from water and land pollution are harvesting thousands of young lives. Over 25, millions were forced to vacate the urban centers to their remote villages after this financial crisis.  India is progressing at a steadier and less drastic strategy and linking the country with new route infrastructures.  The cheaper car produced by India are supposedly to be sold in India for only two thousands dollars.

Third, China is investing heavily on energy resources and lands oversea, particularly in Africa.  India prefers to cajole the USA and signed a less favorable deal for importing light nuclear rods from the USA and satellites from Israel, though it could produce these advanced technological items. The fact is that the British Empire held on to India for three centuries because it realized that the vast Indian population is the hardest working and was adding all the values to the wealth of the British Empire.

 

            During the Soviet Union period of 1917 to 1989, China and India followed the precepts of communism and tight control over private ownership and enterprises.  These two nations experienced famine on large scales and suffered all kinds of miseries and humiliation.  As soon as the Berlin Wall fell and the capitalist system dominated world economy and finance then China and India transformed their development accordingly.

            In China, tiny Deng Xiaoping ordered restitution of collectivity lands to private cultivators and authorized selling part of the production.  Then the private agriculturists were permitted to select what they wanted to plant and production tripled.  Small enterprises and private shops were granted to be formed and in no time 22 millions small industries were hiring 135 millions employees. In China, small modifications in freedom of choice, and small increases in production mean gigantic increases in internal production.

            In India of 1991, the finance minister Manmohan Singh relaxed certain restrictions on doing business. There were no needs for previous permit for each transaction, for importation, for investment, and for increase in production. The Indian economy took off at great strides.

            Currently, the GDP of China has surpassed France and Germany and closing up with Japan.  Shanghai alone has more high rises than New York and Los Angeles combined or 5,000 high-rises.  It is no secret that ten years after the disintegration of the Soviet Union that China and India were viewed as the main enemies to the USA and Europe.  These two powers had the technologies, the know-how, and the resources in raw materials and human potential to rival the economies of western nations.  It is no secret that the hurried frenzy of Bush Junior to invading Iraq unilaterally had the main purpose of dominating oil reserves and blackmailing China and India. 

Amine Maaluf wrote in “A World Adrift” that Colin Powel told ex-President Bush Junior “You break it; you own it.  You invade Iraq then you will end up with the responsibility of caring for 25 million Iraqis” Bush Junior didn’t own it alone; the whole world is sharing the price of a financial and economic meltdown.  In the mean times, China expanded its oil exploration in Africa and built a major pipeline to Russia and Central Asia States; India built many nuclear reactors and pipelines and are not as affected by energy shortages as Europe that relies on Russia, Algeria, and Libya for gas.

            One of the major problems that the world is facing is that in addition to the 50 millions middle class families in the USA and Europe over 150 millions middle class families in China and India can now afford and demand the same consumer items that the USA and European middle classes enjoyed for a century.   They want their cars, their washing machines, their refrigerators and all the commodities that any human desire to own when he can afford it; it is their right and no one can obstruct or make these new middle class desist from their hard earned rights.

            If just 50 millions families in the USA and Europe almost exhausted earth minerals and energies then how humanity is going to satisfy the demands of 200 millions families?